If AI answers the question,
make it quote you.

Score citeability. Pressure-test the news cycle. Edit for machines without killing the story.

Start editing Jump to score

Two editors in every stepThe Human Edge and the SEO Specialist Editor — side by side, always.

One draft, whole journeyScore → live check → advice → polish → rivals. No re-pasting.

Context carries forwardScore, live signals, and advice feed the next prompt — not a fresh start each time.

What you’ll notice

Editing moves that make citeability feel unfairly clear

Bring in your article

Load a sample story — or edit the headline and body yourself. One draft stays with you through every editing step.

Eight sample pieces ready to run.

See how citeable it is

A clear score for how likely answer engines are to quote you — plus why, in plain English.

Two editors argue: human reader vs AI discoverability.

Check what’s live right now

We pull Google, similar coverage, and X — then hold your draft up against what’s circulating today.

Every source shows the site it came from.

Get concrete edit advice

Clear next moves before you touch the text — then a simple ask: ready to polish without losing your voice?

Advice ranked by impact, not jargon.

Polish the article

We densify facts from the web, keep your tone, and return a fuller rewrite plus a plain list of what was added.

Clean polished copy · bullet list of what changed.

See what rivals covered

We find and read competing articles, then flag the angles and facts they have that you don’t.

Walk out knowing exactly what to report next.

How editing works here

Three beats. You’re done before the next stand-up.

Open with your draft

Paste or import a URL. That article becomes the single working copy for the whole flow.

Score it, then pressure-test it

Get a citability score, then check Google and X so you know if you’re behind the news cycle.

Polish, then close the gaps

Accept the rewrite, then see what rival coverage still has on you — and fix it.

Start with your draft

Why not just ChatGPT?

LLMagnet vs OpenAI vs Claude

OpenAI and Claude are excellent general models. LLMagnet is a specialized editorial product for making news articles more citeable — often powered by those same models under the hood.

Capability	LLMagnet	OpenAI ChatGPT	Claude
Built for newsroom article editing	Yes — draft → score → live → advice → polish → rivals	Blank chat	Blank chat
Citeability score for answer engines	Live probe + E-E-A-T matrix	No product score	No product score (rarely cites)
Live news / X / Reddit pressure-test	Built into Live check	Needs custom tooling	Needs custom tooling
Context carries across edits	Score + live + advice feed the next prompt	Manual re-paste	Manual re-paste
Rival coverage gap analysis	Scrapes other outlets vs your draft	DIY research	DIY research

FAQ

Questions editors ask first

Whether an answer engine would lift a sentence from your piece when answering a user — denser claims, named entities, attribution, and extractable structure.

If AI answers the question,make it quote you.